Remember that old commercial for Smuckers Jelly: "With a name like Smuckers, it has to be good"? There are a few products like that: Great, outstanding product--but with a questionable name. That's how I feel about the product in this new informercial called "Right to Bare Legs." Trust me, having seen my girlfriend after her using it--I love the product. What's it do? It is a concealer that literally makes all imperfections on a woman's legs disappear (I suppose it would do the same for male legs, but I don't have the guts to try it).
But the name of the product: Right to Bare Legs? I understand that we live in a time when people are trying to invent all sorts of new "rights" that were never in the Constitution. A right to privacy, while it sounds good, just isn't in the Constitution. And sure, a right to quality education makes for good politics--but it's not something the founding fathers ever wrote.
Major disappointment time, ladies: Despite what the name of this product says, you are not guaranteed a "right to bare legs." I'd like to see the politician who ever tried to sign off on that, too.
And let's go a little bit further. Because that's not the entire name of this product. It's actually 'JOAN RIVERS' Right to Bare Legs.' Okay, wonderful. The rights in the Constitution are granted to us by "the Creator." The right to bare legs? Granted by a talk-show-host / comedian. And by the way, it's a comedian that I don't normally associate with the sexiest legs in the world. How about Angelina Jolie Right to Bare Legs? Now there's a right I'd buy into.
share on:facebook
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment